Congressional Testimony: Veronica Hannevig to Bill Windsor of Lawless Am...

"Niki" gives her testimony in the court of public opinion.

Below are the supporting Exhibits that accompany the typed Congressional Testimony I prepared for my July 20, 2012 interview with Bill Windsor in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.  Learn more about Bill Windsor and his soon coming documentary at Lawless America. 

This Adam Savage video about the RFID has been inserted for emphasis.

 . . .  the Encyclopedia Britannica’s definition of a Prize Court wherein it states:

. . . There is a practice of long standing for belligerents, at the outbreak of war, to enact prize law through statutory legislation; such enactments are presumed to be declaratory of international law but are, in any event, binding on the courts.

In the 20th century, unrestricted sea warfare involving the destruction of merchant shipping has reduced the role of prize courts. The United States has held no prize courts since 1899 for the additional reason of its more liberal policy of requisitioning (i.e., “Taking”) foreign vessels with compensation rather than appropriating them as prizes.

In closing I ask:

Because Article 1, Section 12 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania states:

“No power of suspending laws shall be exercised unless by the Legislature or by its authority.”

Who or What is the “authority” that has the “power of suspending laws” greater than, or equal to those exercised by Pennsylvania Legislators?

Exhibits 

           Exhibit 1                                                                  Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

Additional information:

Supporting evidence:  Due Process Defenders. Web Page 1: http://heros-heroines.blogspot.com/2010/01/irredentists-controversy.html

Document 1: 1 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Defendant.pdf

Document 2: 2 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Defendant - Omar.pdf

Document 3: 3 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Follow-up - Omar & Wides.pdf

Document 4: 4 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Follow-up 2 - Omar & Wides.pdf

Document 5: 5 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Follow-up 3 - Omar & Wides.pdf

Document 6: 6 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Follow-up 4 - Wides.pdf

Document 7: 7 - seizure - 2006 - due process follow-up 5 - wides.pdf

Document 8: 8 - seizure - 2006 - due process follow-up carney.pdf

Herein shown is one of the better examples of the types of legislative doublespeak that are eroding our perceived liberties.

The application, pictured to the right, is the reverse side of a Pennsylvania 2003 "Certification of Birth". The application reveals our part in the perpetuation of a global business scheme that was in effect long before the colonies were chartered.

Notice that the application (second paragraph) is to "correct the certified copy issued" whereby the father and mother swears by oath in the presence of a Notary that their child is a "SUBJECT" (second line, on the left side of the application).

If the corrections are not made by the parents, the "SUBJECT'S SIGNATURE" is required (also under oath) on the 3rd line from bottom on the right side of the form. Now, as all law abiding, good parents who love their children, know, the government mandates education, and they must provide a "birth certificate" to enroll their child in a public school.  Notice how Article VIII of the Pennsylvania Constitution reads in Section 1: Uniformity of Taxation:

"All taxes shall be uniform, upon the same class of subjects, within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax, and shall be levied and collected under general laws."

If you have access to a Pennsylvania 'Certification of Birth' hold it up to the light and notice the 'chain link' watermark.