#21 - Financial Crimes Enterprises Are Operating in the Courts of Novi i...

077 - Karl Lentz - Claim of Conusance

Congressional Testimony: Veronica Hannevig to Bill Windsor of Lawless Am...

"Niki" gives her testimony in the court of public opinion.

Below are the supporting Exhibits that accompany the typed Congressional Testimony I prepared for my July 20, 2012 interview with Bill Windsor in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.  Learn more about Bill Windsor and his soon coming documentary at Lawless America. 

This Adam Savage video about the RFID has been inserted for emphasis.

 . . .  the Encyclopedia Britannica’s definition of a Prize Court wherein it states:

. . . There is a practice of long standing for belligerents, at the outbreak of war, to enact prize law through statutory legislation; such enactments are presumed to be declaratory of international law but are, in any event, binding on the courts.

In the 20th century, unrestricted sea warfare involving the destruction of merchant shipping has reduced the role of prize courts. The United States has held no prize courts since 1899 for the additional reason of its more liberal policy of requisitioning (i.e., “Taking”) foreign vessels with compensation rather than appropriating them as prizes.

In closing I ask:

Because Article 1, Section 12 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania states:

“No power of suspending laws shall be exercised unless by the Legislature or by its authority.”

Who or What is the “authority” that has the “power of suspending laws” greater than, or equal to those exercised by Pennsylvania Legislators?

Exhibits 

           Exhibit 1                                                                  Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

Additional information:

Supporting evidence:  Due Process Defenders. Web Page 1: http://heros-heroines.blogspot.com/2010/01/irredentists-controversy.html

Document 1: 1 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Defendant.pdf

Document 2: 2 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Defendant - Omar.pdf

Document 3: 3 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Follow-up - Omar & Wides.pdf

Document 4: 4 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Follow-up 2 - Omar & Wides.pdf

Document 5: 5 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Follow-up 3 - Omar & Wides.pdf

Document 6: 6 - Seizure - 2006 - Due Process Follow-up 4 - Wides.pdf

Document 7: 7 - seizure - 2006 - due process follow-up 5 - wides.pdf

Document 8: 8 - seizure - 2006 - due process follow-up carney.pdf

Herein shown is one of the better examples of the types of legislative doublespeak that are eroding our perceived liberties.

The application, pictured to the right, is the reverse side of a Pennsylvania 2003 "Certification of Birth". The application reveals our part in the perpetuation of a global business scheme that was in effect long before the colonies were chartered.

Notice that the application (second paragraph) is to "correct the certified copy issued" whereby the father and mother swears by oath in the presence of a Notary that their child is a "SUBJECT" (second line, on the left side of the application).

If the corrections are not made by the parents, the "SUBJECT'S SIGNATURE" is required (also under oath) on the 3rd line from bottom on the right side of the form. Now, as all law abiding, good parents who love their children, know, the government mandates education, and they must provide a "birth certificate" to enroll their child in a public school.  Notice how Article VIII of the Pennsylvania Constitution reads in Section 1: Uniformity of Taxation:

"All taxes shall be uniform, upon the same class of subjects, within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax, and shall be levied and collected under general laws."

If you have access to a Pennsylvania 'Certification of Birth' hold it up to the light and notice the 'chain link' watermark.

The Toronto 9/11 Hearings - 9/11/11

Era of Love & Peace (man known as Vic Beck)

More at:  FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES and THE LETTER OF THE LAW.

Jury Power

Judicial Corruption

Whose idea was it to perpetrate a "unified system" of corrupt Courts in Pennsylvania?

How and why is it perpetuated?

When a judge acquiesces to the mediocrity implied by banal 'form and process', where does one obtain the "honest services" for which s/he has paid?

Are judges aware that they, too, are being defrauded by those who perpetrated and perpetuate a system of corrupt courts?

More about Dr. Richard I Fine is available at How To Disqualify Your State Superior Court Judge & Get A New Trial.

Another reason to dissolve United States, Inc.

Have the American people been the unknowing victims of TREASONOUS FRAUD?

How important is an Oath of Office?

Were you, or are you now, in the U.S. military?  Were you told that the U.S. or State you served was defined under Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (14)(15)?

(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(15) “United States” means—

  (A) a Federal corporation;

  (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

  (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

If you believe you've been a victim of a seditious or treasonous fraud your remedy may be found in the verbage of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1481(b):

(b) Whenever the loss of United States nationality is put in issue in any action or proceeding commenced on or after September 26, 1961 under, or by virtue of, the provisions of this chapter or any other Act, the burden shall be upon the person or party claiming that such loss occurred, to establish such claim by a preponderance of the evidence. Any person who commits or performs, or who has committed or performed, any act of expatriation under the provisions of this chapter or any other Act shall be presumed to have done so voluntarily, but such presumption may be rebutted upon a showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the act or acts committed or performed were not done voluntarily.

What is you plan?

In the Court of Public Opinion

In the ancient Book of Joel (2:17-18) it is written:  .  .  .  "Spare your people, Yahweh, And don't give Your heritage to reproach, that the nations should rule over them. Why should they say among the peoples, 'Where is their God?'"    .  .  . 

Click HERE for the controversy.

This is what went to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. 

Lisa Gillick filed the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's first response, a "Motion to Quash" AFTER the Lackawanna County District Attorney's Office realized a DEFAULT was being filed. 

A reply to the "Motion to Quash" with Authorities was submitted. 

An unknown Superior Court entity granted Gillick's "Motion to Quash".

A Request for Affirmative Relief was submitted and granted by the Court of Common Pleas - Lackawanna County.

The following Right to Know request asking questions about the Affirmative Relief was submitted to Lackawanna County.

Rather than answering the questions presented, Christina Gallagher, on behalf of Mary Ferrario Rinaldi, the Clerk of Courts for Lackawanna County, retaliated as follows:

The hearing took place in the Lackawanna County Courthouse in a courtroom where a non-gold-fringed-American flag was situate to the right of Senior Judge, JEROME CHESLOCK, a retired judge from Monroe County.  The following is the transcript of how Judge Cheslock ruled in this hearing.

The following is what Cheslock said he read.  See page 4 of the (above) transcript.

Here is what City of Carbondale Police Officers Dave Fofi and James Reed used as evidence on behalf of the Commonwealth.

Here is The Law:

Do you believe you have the authority to render a verdict?

Here's what it says in another ancient book:

1Co 6:2 - 3  Do you not know that the set-apart ones shall judge the world?  And if the world is judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters?  Do you not know that we shall judge messengers?  How much more, matters of this life?  (ISR)

ARTICLES OF FREEDOM

What happened with the "bailout" money?

University of Ottawa Professor, Michel Chossudovsky, explains what's happening with the "bailout" money.

CONTINENTAL CONGRESS ELECTIONS - OCTOBER 10th 2009

The Continental Congress will convene on November 8, 2009.

Congress requires our oversight.

Congressmen (like Mike Rogers) need our support.

So: What's the next step for a free people?

- Reaffirm your allegiance to the organic principles of our constitutional republic.

- Become involved in the October 10, 2009 election process to elect delegates to the November 9 - 22 Continental Congress of 2009.

- Learn more about the Continental Congress 2009 at http://www.cc2009.us/about-cc2009.

Submission #65632 to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Philadelphia

Please investigate whether a criminal conspiracy involving "Impersonation/Identity Fraud" and "Advance Fee Scheme(s)" have been perpetrated (and continues to be perpetuated) by members of the Pennsylvania Bar Association in the "County of Lackawanna" and/or "Lackawanna County" and The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania and/or the Pennsylvania Unified Judicial System. For your convenience I have put what I believe to be substantive evidence onto the following blogs: Integrity Training and The Truth Store.

AN OPEN LETTER to PA and FEDERAL LEGISLATORS in OPPOSITION TO GOVERNMENT MANDATED ID: BIOMETRIC and OTHER!

We all know that precedence for obtaining government identification, whether it’s a passport, driver’s license or “photo”, has ‘always’ included the submission of a completed application and monetary consideration (i.e., “payment”) to the issuing authority. Therefore, I will attempt to make known my concerns from three perspectives; the lawful, the legal and the prophetic, within the parameters of your historical fiduciary duties as representatives to the people of our nation and the essential characteristics of indenture contracts; adhesion and unconscionable. But, first, I preface what I am about to say with the well known, yet to be rebutted, fundamental point of reference upon which I present lawful, legal and prophetic opposition to the federal Real ID Act of 2005, or any other such mandated identification that may be promulgated.

PREFACE
Recent documentaries have revealed that the cost to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who print the American people’s ‘units of exchange’, i.e., “dollars” or “money”) is approximately $.042 to print a "bill" of any denomination, therefore, when a worker receives $10.00 for his/her labor the owners of the Federal Reserve profit approximately $9.958 just for printing that “bill”. Another +/- $2.00 (20%) Federal Tax is then demanded by agents of the IRS on behalf of those who print the money. As I calculate it, with the present use of these "bills", for each $10.00 of a working man's labor his DEBT to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who print the money) is approximately $11.96. Should a laborer acquiesce by chip or plastic card (i.e., a likely future use of any “Real [government issued] ID”) to a totally cashless economy, the profits to the owners of the Federal Reserve will increase exponentially! Without consideration for other forms of taxation and interest on loans and mortgages, American men and women will profit those who oversee the manufacturing of the card or chip they must use; approximately $12.00 for every $10.00 of a man's labor! In fact, when you take the time to do the math, you will see that Governor Rendell’s $2.00 per hour increase in the “minimum wage” of Pennsylvanians still kept the affected ‘wage earner’ at “minimum wage” and essentially increased the revenues of the owners of the Federal Reserve (at least) $1.92 per hour, per the tens of thousands of recipients!

Today the people of our nation are at a threshold. Will you, our elected representatives who took an oath to support, obey and defend with fidelity the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions of a “republic” with a democratic process, support, obey and defend with fidelity that Form of government to which you pledge your allegiance and swore your oath; or, Will you, willingly volunteer the people of your nation into a “feudal” form of governance with a communistic “party” process wherein the ‘American dream’ will be based on an optimal form of voluntary indebted servitude to a (relative) ‘handful of men’ who print the money and, at their whim, can pull the proverbial “plug” on an ATM or erase a name from a database? (On a personal note, I can’t help but to suspect that the descendents of our European ancestors who remained in Europe and have a sense of history are laughing at our naivety.)

HISTORY
According to "http://findlaw.com" - "All that is necessary for most contracts to be legally valid are the following two elements:

- All parties are in agreement (after an offer has been made by one party and accepted by the other).

- Something of value has been exchanged, such as cash, services, or goods (or a promise to exchange such an item) for something else of value. "

Therefore, given the binding nature of our freewill participation in contracts, it is disingenuous to believe that the "Charters" (i.e., the ‘corporate contracts’) that were granted to "new world" colonizers (including "William Penn, Esquire, and his heirs and assigns" in 1681 by Charles the Second, Chancellor Heneage, Lord Finch, and their heirs and successors) somehow (miraculously) disappeared in 1776 by a few (relatively speaking) signatures on a “Declaration of Independence”. Or, in 1791 with the ratification of the “Bill of Rights”, i.e., the first 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

Indeed, Esquire Penn's obligations to his corporate feudal masters most likely remained in tact and it was simply a matter of business-as-usual for European investors to commission their 'privy councilors' to promulgate the contract law(s) that would continue to govern their global commerce to this day. No doubt that this was, and continues to be, easily done with the blessings of the people who have not yet recognized that their venerated Constitution was written in 'doublespeak'! Since the birth of our nation platitudes like "emancipation", "reconstruction", "reorganization", “war on terror”, etc. have toyed with our emotions and left us vulnerable to proverbial “ravaging wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Have we forgotten that "councilors" still promulgate the laws upon which the courts must act? And that the “privy councilors” became the “Board of Trade and Plantations”? What (now) are they called in the global marketplace? Are they now members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) who are using members of the United States Congress as their brokers to implement the documentation (i.e., the Real ID) that will give them absolute ownership of our physical and intellectual properties?

THE LAWFUL
According to www.FindLaw.com 'the freedom of contract' is "a power or right to contract and freely determine the provisions of contracts without arbitrary or unreasonable legal restrictions esp. as guaranteed under the contract clause of Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution". The Congress of these united States, however, had the power to Amend this Constitution: And they did!

THE LEGAL
With the 13th and 14th Amendments to the original, duly ratified U.S. Constitution of 1791, preparatory steps were taken by Congress to, in a business-as-usual manner, re-venue into the system of government with which they were most comfortable ALL Americans who were willing to alienate (or lien) themselves from their "unalienable Rights" into a statutory form of feudalism. In 1865 the 13th Amendment was crafted with words that allow for 'voluntary servitude' and "punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted". Furthermore, Congress gave themselves the "power to enforce this article (the 13th Amendment; i.e., voluntary servitude) by appropriate legislation". The next step in this re-venuing scheme came in 1868. Complimentary with feudalistic governance and an (oligarchic) party process, Democrat and Republican members of Congress gave to themselves jurisdiction over the descendants of those Americans who voluntarily "ceded" themselves into statutory servitude in a manner consistent with the laws enacted to facilitate an economy based on the principles of “debenture”. With the assistance of the Democrat and Republican members of Congress, a silent (plutocratic) coup incrementally continued in 1913 with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th and 17th Amendments, in 1933 with Roosevelt's monetary 'reorganization' (a “New Deal” for his plutocratic cronies), in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act, then with the Coinage Act of 1965 whereby, (according to wikipedia) constitutionally mandated silver was eliminated from the circulating dimes and quarter dollars, and diminished in the half dollar. In addition to the above provisions, for which it is best known, the act:

- Made all coins and currency of the United States (including certain bank issues) a legal tender. This has been taken to reverse the demonetisation of the Trade Dollar, and

- Gave the Secretary (of the Treasury) broad discretion to enter into contracts to assure an adequate supply of clad coins, without regard to public procurement laws.

Fortunately, in Pennsylvania, the crafters of the Pennsylvania Constitution had the foresight to provide remedy to those men and women who would become cognizant of this blatant “bait and switch” fraud and in Article 1, Section 17 provided that; "No ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, or making irrevocable any grant of special privileges or immunities, shall be passed."

THE PROPHETIC
Prophecy, when it comes to pass, is nothing more than the consequences of predictable societal behaviors.

The prophecy found in Rev. 13:16-17 seems consistent with the mandated Real ID AND with the anticipated consequences of the normal behaviors of a statutorily oppressed people who may be “fearful, and unbelieving” (Rev. 21:8).

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads (i.e., perhaps a ‘mind set’ in the ‘executive functioning’ area of one’s brain?): And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name"

BUT, (if I’m correct in my assessment) there’s another side of this prophecy. It’s found in Rev. 18:11–13:

“And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more: The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, . . . and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.”

Who knows! It may be that all that is needed is a leader with access that encourages and sustains the “courage” of others to come out of an economic bondage of their own making. After all, one would think that a people who have been praying “Thy kingdom come” for 2000 years and have the ability to “bind” and “loose” at will would be more than willing to follow such a leader and collectively shake off their oppressors.

CONCLUSION
In my opinion, the promulgation of the Real ID Act of 2005 is a mere formality to give credible authority to a parallel system of feudal governance that IF ALLOWED will authorize the final death blow to our (previously guaranteed) constitutional republic, and usher in that which “Christians” have feared for two millennia. Truly, I reiterate what I said previously;

Today the people of our nation are at a threshold. Will you, our elected representatives who took an oath to support, obey and defend with fidelity the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions of a “republic” with a democratic process, support, obey and defend with fidelity that Form of government to which you pledge your allegiance and swore your oath; or, Will you, willingly volunteer the people of your nation into a “feudal” form of governance with a communistic “party” process wherein the ‘American dream’ will be based on an optimal form of voluntary indebted servitude to a (relative) ‘handful of men’ who print the money and, at their whim, can pull the proverbial “plug” on an ATM or erase a name from a database?

I can only quote scripture, speak from the objective lessons of History, and share my personal experience with the municipal magistrate’s “prize court”. (Yes, “prize court”. Look it up in the Encyclopedia Britannica.)

My experience* speaks specifically to the issues pertinent to this testimony in opposition to government issued ID that is mandated to be purchased with debt based money; whether it’s this “Real ID” issue currently before the Pennsylvania legislature or any other! Therefore, it is my desire that whatever the members of the Pennsylvania legislature decide to do that they include provisions that will “support, obey and defend” the Constitutional protections provided for men and women, like my self, who choose NOT to apply for commercial benefits and privileges that must be paid for with a debt-based currency, a “legal” fiat “tender” that alienates us from our “unalienable Rights” and causes many to suffer undue ‘pains and penalties’ from court officers who choose to gain political favor by sustaining, what amounts to, treasonous Bills of Attainder.

My personal evaluation of the lawful, legal and prophetic characteristics of the proposed mandated legislation has been from the vantage of a 1960’s era (pre Treasury Department “mercenary”) Navy veteran who took an oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. I am a woman who believes the "self evident truth" that she "resides" in her "freehold" (i.e., her "self"/”body” whose name is the “title” that “identifies” her) until she returns (at death) to her "domicile" wherein she must give an account to her “Creator”. With that said, ANY application that I would make for a “benefit” and “privilege” with debt based money, i.e., a “unit of exchange” that essentially enslaves the labors of my future generations to the future generations of the mere men who print that money, would violate my Sovereign's Law against "coveting" that “benefit” or “privilege”, and "stealing" to get it! Such are the characteristics and subsequent consequences of the indenture contracts that have been legislated by Democrat and Republican Congressional and State legislators since the Civil War. Clearly, we, the American people have been legislated into a form of mandated statutory feudalism by systemic adhesion and unconscionable contracts with those who print the U.S. currency, our mandated unit of exchange. Our ‘legal tender’ has been monopolized by a global oligarchy of plutocrats whose ultimate goal appears to be the megalomaniacal occupation and distribution of the labors and produce of our global resources; human and otherwise. The councilors who craft and mandate legislation such as the Real ID without which we, the people, are presumed to have no identity and, therefore, no standing in law are the true "terrorist" from whom we, the people, need your legislated defenses and protection. So, I ask: Will you ‘cast out the moneychangers’ and legislate for the people those defenses and protections necessary for us to live our lives with the integrity expected of us by our “Creator”; i.e., the Sovereign to whom we must all (eventually) bow our knee and give an account?

* MY EXPERIENCE
THE REVERSE SIDE OF THE GEORGIA AND NEVADA LICENSES TELL THE STORY AS TO WHY I STOPPED PURCHASING LICENSES. THEY CERTAINLY DID NOT LICENSE ME TO OPERATE A TOYOTA CAMRY THAT SEATS 5. THE PURCHASE OF LICENSE REQUIRED THAT I VIOLATE MY CONSCIOUS AND LIE THAT I AM ENGAGED IN 'INTERSTATE COMMERCE'.

KNOWING THAT I CANNOT 'DRIVE' A COMMERCIALLY REGISTERED VEHICLE UNLESS I HAVE A COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE I CHOSE TO KEEP THE LAW AS I UNDERSTOOD IT AND USE 'THE LAW OF THE FLAG' IN MY TRAVELS.

THE SUBSEQUENT SEIZURE OF WHAT I PERCEIVED TO BE MY PROPERTY AND THE CAPTURE OF A LAWFUL U.S. FLAG SUGGESTS THAT WE HAVE A 'FOREIGN OCCUPYING POWER' IN CONTROL OF OUR NATION’S COURTS. THE POWER APPEARS TO BE THAT OF COMMERCE, AND OUR NATION (IT APPEARS) IS BEING GOVERNED BY AN INTERNATIONAL OLIGARCHY OF PLUTOCRATS WHO MAKE THE LAWS UPON WHICH THE COURTS MUST ACT.

I BROUGHT MY GRIEVANCE ON APPEAL AS A "PETITION FOR REVIEW" OF THIS SUBSTANTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER THAT INVOLVES ISSUES OF “JURISDICTION”, “TITLE” AND “OWNERSHIP”, AND, ON THE COMMERCIAL SIDE; “AGENCY”, “IDENTITY” AND “OWNERSHIP”.

HERE IS THE ORIGINAL PETITION FOR REVIEW THAT WAS BROUGHT BEFORE THE LACKAWANNA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS AND THE SUPERIOR COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT.

FEEL AT LIBERTY TO REVIEW THE BLOGS AND THE COURT DOCKETS.

WHAT FORM OF GOVERNMENT HAS THE UNITED STATES?

"Communism", "Feudalism" or a "Constitutional republic"? You decide.

Ron Paul on the "Real ID"

The ACLU Responds

To the right is the ACLU's (AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF PENNSYLVANIA's) response to my recent request for their assistance in bringing closure to my controversy with the Commonwealth.

The controversy brought before the court as a "Petition For Review" asked the court to determine whether, as an American, I had sovereign jurisdiction or commercial agency, marketable title or fictional identification, and whether my ownership of property was absolute or conditional.

Apparently members of the ACLU did not believe that resolution to this controversy would be a benefit to a large class of people or lead to a change in the law upon which the courts must act.